![a dogs purpose water a dogs purpose water](https://media.ksdk.com/assets/KSDK/images/387243129/387243129_750x422.jpg)
The No Animals Were Harmed program is based on the comprehensive Guidelines for the Safe Use of Animals in Filmed Media, rigorous, species-specific protocols that are defined, reviewed, and regularly updated by a Scientific Advisory Committee of leading, independent animal scientists, animal behaviorists, veterinarians, and animal ethicists. We are the first to address and fight cruelty and abuse, and no such things happened on the set of ‘A Dog Purpose.’”Ībout the “No Animals Were Harmed®” program “It is disappointing that the public was misled by a manufactured controversy promoted by a radical organization like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals with a mission to remove animals from films and other parts of our lives.
![a dogs purpose water a dogs purpose water](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51nVvnrRukL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg)
Kwane Stewart, the veterinarian who heads American Humane’s “No Animals Were Harmed” program. “American Humane is at the forefront of combatting cruelty to animals through our rescue efforts, support of anti-cruelty raids, and work to improve conditions for animals around the world,” said Dr. The New York Times recently noted that the accusations of mistreatment on the set have been “largely debunked.” The findings of the independent, third-party investigation corroborate this conclusion.
![a dogs purpose water a dogs purpose water](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/csLiYr5OGbg/maxresdefault.jpg)
Although the dog was momentarily stressed, based on studying additional footage not included in the video, body posture, and the fact that he quickly and willingly went into the water and performed the scene soon afterwards, a separate, independent, board certified Veterinary Behaviorist brought in to examine the events concluded that there was “no lasting stress response or conditioned fear of the water as a result.” Eyewitnesses also report that following the water scene, the dog was wagging his tail and wanted to go back into the water. That being said, it is important to note that this was recognized and the scene did not proceed as insinuated by the misleadingly edited video. At the same time, American Humane believes that the handling of the dog in the first scene in the video should have been gentler and signs of stress recognized earlier. The investigation and eyewitness reports affirmed that throughout its work on the set, the dog was treated with great care, attentiveness and respect.
#A dogs purpose water full
A full spectrum of preparation and safety measures were in place, including the following:.The dog was not forced to swim in the water at any time. The first video scene was stopped after the dog showed signs of stress.In fact, the two scenes shown in the edited video were filmed at different times. The video was deliberately edited for the purpose of misleading the public and stoking outrage.
![a dogs purpose water a dogs purpose water](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/6NazaRsBWvOIZ-zeBn-3dLuufAc=/0x0:378x208/1200x800/filters:focal(120x34:180x94)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/52824647/Screen_Shot_2017_01_19_at_11.09.45_AM.0.png)
The investigation and eyewitness reports have brought to light the following facts: The findings of the independent investigation confirm that no animals were harmed in those scenes and numerous preventative safety measures were in place. The decisions by the individual or individuals who captured and deliberately edited the footage, and then waited longer than 15 months to release the manipulated video only days before the movie’s premiere, raise serious questions about their motives and ethics. WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FebruAn independent, third-party investigation conducted by a respected animal cruelty expert into the treatment of animals in the filming of “A Dog’s Purpose” concluded that an edited video given to the gossip site TMZ mischaracterized the events on the set.